From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20479 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2012 14:50:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 20447 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Oct 2012 14:50:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:50:15 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9OEoEll024705 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:50:14 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-77.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.77]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9OEo7eh002300 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:50:13 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:50:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [testsuite commit] Fix -m32 results [Re: [PATCH] Remove some KPASSes in gdb.base/callfuncs.exp] Message-ID: <20121024145006.GA29345@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <201210231827.q9NIRdld028342@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20121024134828.GA24180@host2.jankratochvil.net> <201210241435.q9OEZhoL009488@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201210241435.q9OEZhoL009488@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00443.txt.bz2 On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:35:43 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Your "fix" has an annoying side-effect. Took me a while to figure out > where the: > > Executing on host: gcc -c -o ilp3216410.o ilp3216410.c (timeout = 300) > spawn gcc -c -o ilp3216410.o ilp3216410.c > Executing on host: gcc -c -o reg6416410.o reg6416410.s (timeout = 300) > spawn gcc -c -o reg6416410.o reg6416410.s > reg6416410.s: Assembler messages: > reg6416410.s:9: Error: bad register name `%r8' > reg6416410.s:10: Error: bad register name `%r9' > reg6416410.s:11: Error: bad register name `%r10' > reg6416410.s:12: Error: bad register name `%r11' > reg6416410.s:13: Error: bad register name `%r12' > reg6416410.s:14: Error: bad register name `%r13' > reg6416410.s:15: Error: bad register name `%r14' > reg6416410.s:16: Error: bad register name `%r15' > compiler exited with status 1 > output is: > reg6416410.s: Assembler messages: > reg6416410.s:9: Error: bad register name `%r8' > reg6416410.s:10: Error: bad register name `%r9' > reg6416410.s:11: Error: bad register name `%r10' > reg6416410.s:12: Error: bad register name `%r11' > reg6416410.s:15: Error: bad register name `%r14' > reg6416410.s:16: Error: bad register name `%r15' > > in the middle of my test output came from. It always happens for those is_ilp32_target & co. functions. But it is only in gdb.log, not in gdb.sum. Regards, Jan