From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: [PATCH] Remove some KPASSes in gdb.base/callfuncs.exp
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201210231827.q9NIRdld028342@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
Just fixed the bugs. Committed as obvious.
2012-10-23 Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
* gdb.base/callfuncs.exp: PR gdb/12796, gdb/12798 and gdb/12800
are now fixed.
Index: gdb.base/callfuncs.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/callfuncs.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.53
diff -u -p -r1.53 callfuncs.exp
--- gdb.base/callfuncs.exp 20 Sep 2012 14:43:48 -0000 1.53
+++ gdb.base/callfuncs.exp 23 Oct 2012 18:23:12 -0000
@@ -149,19 +149,15 @@ proc do_function_calls {} {
}
if [support_complex_tests] {
- setup_kfail_for_target gdb/12798 "x86_64-*-*"
gdb_test "p t_float_complex_values(fc1, fc2)" " = 1"
gdb_test "p t_float_complex_values(fc3, fc4)" " = 0"
- setup_kfail_for_target gdb/12800 "x86_64-*-*"
gdb_test "p t_float_complex_many_args(fc1, fc2, fc3, fc4, fc1, fc2, fc3, fc4, fc1, fc2, fc3, fc4, fc1, fc2, fc3, fc4)" " = 1"
gdb_test "p t_float_complex_many_args(fc1, fc1, fc1, fc1, fc1, fc1, fc1, fc1, fc1, fc1, fc1, fc1, fc1, fc1, fc1, fc1)" " = 0"
- setup_kfail_for_target gdb/12798 "x86_64-*-*"
gdb_test "p t_double_complex_values(dc1, dc2)" " = 1"
gdb_test "p t_double_complex_values(dc3, dc4)" " = 0"
- setup_kfail_for_target gdb/12800 "x86_64-*-*"
gdb_test "p t_double_complex_many_args(dc1, dc2, dc3, dc4, dc1, dc2, dc3, dc4, dc1, dc2, dc3, dc4, dc1, dc2, dc3, dc4)" " = 1"
gdb_test "p t_double_complex_many_args(dc1, dc1, dc1, dc1, dc1, dc1, dc1, dc1, dc1, dc1, dc1, dc1, dc1, dc1, dc1, dc1)" " = 0"
@@ -246,17 +242,14 @@ proc do_function_calls {} {
if [support_complex_tests] {
- setup_kfail_for_target gdb/12796 "x86_64-*-*"
gdb_test "p t_structs_fc(struct_val1)" ".*= 3 \\+ 3 \\* I" \
"call inferior func with struct - returns float _Complex"
setup_kfail_for_target gdb/12783 "i?86-*-*"
- setup_kfail_for_target gdb/12796 "x86_64-*-*"
gdb_test "p t_structs_dc(struct_val1)" ".*= 4 \\+ 4 \\* I" \
"call inferior func with struct - returns double _Complex"
setup_kfail_for_target gdb/12783 "i?86-*-*"
- setup_kfail_for_target gdb/12796 "x86_64-*-*"
gdb_test "p t_structs_ldc(struct_val1)" "= 5 \\+ 5 \\* I" \
"call inferior func with struct - returns long double _Complex"
}
next reply other threads:[~2012-10-23 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-23 18:27 Mark Kettenis [this message]
2012-10-24 13:48 ` [testsuite commit] Fix -m32 results [Re: [PATCH] Remove some KPASSes in gdb.base/callfuncs.exp] Jan Kratochvil
2012-10-24 14:35 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-10-24 14:50 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-10-24 15:05 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-10-24 16:19 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201210231827.q9NIRdld028342@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
--to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox