From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15648 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2012 14:14:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 15638 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Oct 2012 14:14:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:13:55 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9630A1C7AED; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:13:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ISiMbHpj5LAu; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:13:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7596E1C797A; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:13:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CBAF8C7F67; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:13:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:14:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Yao Qi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Really release IPC resources in info-os.exp Message-ID: <20121023141353.GB3555@adacore.com> References: <1350962676-18529-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1350962676-18529-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00414.txt.bz2 > 2012-10-23 Yao Qi > > * gdb.base/info-os.exp: Resume the inferior until it exits. Regardless of your problem, any change that removes a call to send_gdb and uses gdb_test instead is a good change in my books. So OK to commit. IIRC, you don't need the leading ".*", which is implicit, but it might be clearer the way you have it. Thanks, -- Joel