From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9558 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2012 08:36:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 9453 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Oct 2012 08:36:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 08:36:43 +0000 Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q9N8abvW019134; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:36:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q9N8aZHO017504; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:36:35 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 08:36:00 -0000 Message-Id: <201210230836.q9N8aZHO017504@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: yao@codesourcery.com CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <50864048.4010400@codesourcery.com> (message from Yao Qi on Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:59:20 +0800) Subject: Re: ping: [PATCH] Fix kfail in gdb.base/callfuncs.exp References: <1350301607-16574-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <50864048.4010400@codesourcery.com> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00402.txt.bz2 > Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:59:20 +0800 > From: Yao Qi > > On 10/15/2012 07:46 PM, Yao Qi wrote: > > gdb/testsuite: > > > > 2012-10-15 Yao Qi > > > > * gdb.base/callfuncs.exp (do_function_calls): KFAIL some test > > for x86 with -m64. > > Ping. http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-10/msg00212.html I don't think decoupling the triplet from the setup_kfail this way is a good idea.