From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4617 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2012 07:44:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 4608 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Oct 2012 07:44:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 07:44:30 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9L7iU9R023116 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 03:44:30 -0400 Received: from spoyarek (vpn1-7-22.sin2.redhat.com [10.67.7.22]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9L7iQha007574; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 03:44:27 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 07:44:00 -0000 From: Siddhesh Poyarekar To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Sergio Durigan Junior Subject: Re: [PATCH] Expand fortran array bounds sizes to LONGEST Message-ID: <20121021131337.0ff8afa2@spoyarek> In-Reply-To: <20121015185626.GA27290@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120821152540.013b4d99@spoyarek> <20121015132555.GA15411@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20121015185626.GA27290@host2.jankratochvil.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00379.txt.bz2 On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 20:56:26 +0200, Jan wrote: > On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 15:25:55 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > I have filed for it now: > > Invalid debug/ array bounds w/-fno-range-check and 32-bit > > target http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54934 > > Therefore it looks as a valid gfortran FSF GCC HEAD bug so provided > a hand-patched .S file for i386; patched GDB PASSes with it. Thanks, I'll update my stash with this test. Siddhesh