From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23352 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2012 15:58:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 23284 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Oct 2012 15:58:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:57:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F13F01C7CBC; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:57:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id jNlJRab5LvPF; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:57:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C002C1C7E7D; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:57:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A703EC6F87; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 08:57:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:58:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFA: probable rs6000-aix-tdep.c bug found by clang Message-ID: <20121018155748.GT3050@adacore.com> References: <87mwzk279g.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20121017212417.GP3050@adacore.com> <507FC786.50400@redhat.com> <20121018153304.GS3050@adacore.com> <5080244B.30601@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5080244B.30601@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00329.txt.bz2 > I now notice the PR predates the patch that added this (a8cfed2a), and > it seems the patch was meant to fix exactly that single-step issue in > the PR. So I guess we could close it. That was the first thing I started looking for when I eventually checked the PR :-). I closed the ticket. > Searching bugzilla for aix finds a handful of PRs, and most looks > quite old. I'd be nice to give them a little triage love. :-) I can add that to my list... -- Joel