From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: hjl.tools@gmail.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: PING: PATCH: PR backtrace/14646: [x32] backtrace doesn't work
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 10:10:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201210151009.q9FA9r3O027266@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOoxdjss8YfB1KLFyN6unWHP2RzZVszmVsiOCjrAiDqrUw@mail.gmail.com> (hjl.tools@gmail.com)
> Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 09:38:32 -0700
> From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
>
> The current GDB doesn't work on x32. This patch:
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-09/msg00714.html
>
> isn't perfect where $pc/$sp is displayed as 64-bit integer. But
> otherwise, GDB works fine.
Finally found some time to dig a little bit deeper. The x32 ABI isn't
the only 32-bit ABI with 64-bit registers. The mips n32 ABI has
exactly the same issue. The relevant code there carries the following
comment:
/* Use pointer types for registers if we can. For n32 we can not,
since we do not have a 64-bit pointer type. */
So I'd say that you should probably commit the diff in:
<http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-09/msg00714.html>
on the grounds that other 32-bit on 64-bit ABIs also punt on the issue.
But it would be good to try to come up with a way to print 64-bit
registers as pointers for this class of ABIs. But that should almost
certainly done by fixing target-independent parts of GDB and not by
adding more complexity to the target descriptions like your last
couple of diffs did.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-15 10:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-03 15:26 H.J. Lu
2012-10-03 15:43 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-10-03 15:59 ` H.J. Lu
2012-10-03 17:03 ` H.J. Lu
2012-10-05 2:08 ` H.J. Lu
[not found] ` <20121003154712.GH3028@adacore.com>
[not found] ` <CAMe9rOreX6NAf08vD8=k4LBGevvTFUd-tqwwWmbsA3iRxxsE2A@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <201210040657.q946vJlc006566@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
[not found] ` <CAMe9rOounZ9e14QeMLvXR64gG5rJxQ9nNxt64YoLW54bx5VtHw@mail.gmail.com>
2012-10-08 19:48 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-10-08 20:04 ` H.J. Lu
2012-10-08 20:22 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-10-08 20:38 ` H.J. Lu
2012-10-08 20:47 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-10-08 21:01 ` H.J. Lu
2012-10-09 15:32 ` H.J. Lu
2012-10-09 15:40 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-10-09 15:48 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-10-09 16:35 ` H.J. Lu
2012-10-09 16:38 ` H.J. Lu
2012-10-15 10:10 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2012-10-15 20:41 ` H.J. Lu
2012-10-11 22:34 ` H.J. Lu
2012-10-12 8:31 ` Mark Kettenis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201210151009.q9FA9r3O027266@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
--to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox