From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-95127-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 9959 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2012 19:48:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 9923 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Oct 2012 19:48:24 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 19:48:08 +0000
Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1])	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q98Jm5fI006037;	Mon, 8 Oct 2012 21:48:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q98Jm3D7020175;	Mon, 8 Oct 2012 21:48:03 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 19:48:00 -0000
Message-Id: <201210081948.q98Jm3D7020175@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: hjl.tools@gmail.com
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to:	<CAMe9rOounZ9e14QeMLvXR64gG5rJxQ9nNxt64YoLW54bx5VtHw@mail.gmail.com>	(hjl.tools@gmail.com)
Subject: Re: PING: PATCH: PR backtrace/14646: [x32] backtrace doesn't work
References: <CAMe9rOrOnd8mnjrhbKNkkDajQ_CwjOF5kSZnZdDSbf8Gv0aQEA@mail.gmail.com>	<20121003154712.GH3028@adacore.com>	<CAMe9rOreX6NAf08vD8=k4LBGevvTFUd-tqwwWmbsA3iRxxsE2A@mail.gmail.com>	<201210040657.q946vJlc006566@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <CAMe9rOounZ9e14QeMLvXR64gG5rJxQ9nNxt64YoLW54bx5VtHw@mail.gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2

> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 06:57:22 -0700
> From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
> 
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps the user-regs.c mechanism can be used to establish eip -> pc
> > and esp -> sp mappings?
> 
> It doesn't help as long as gdbarch_pc_regnum/gdbarch_sp_regnum
> are used for both frame pc/sp value and unwind pc/sp value.  For x32,
> we want eip/esp for frame pc/sp value and rip/rsp for unwind pc/sp
> value.

That probably means we need to set gdbarch_pc_regnum (and
gdbarch_sp_regnum) to -1 for x32.