From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21228 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2012 15:16:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 21219 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Oct 2012 15:16:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 Oct 2012 15:16:40 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892F71C7A27; Sun, 7 Oct 2012 11:16:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 1IX2MgFJ5LQD; Sun, 7 Oct 2012 11:16:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ECF11C79C9; Sun, 7 Oct 2012 11:16:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C6B56C490C; Sun, 7 Oct 2012 08:16:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 15:16:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Andrew Burgess , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Display full file path in MI style disassembly listing Message-ID: <20121007151633.GA2850@adacore.com> References: <506DB4B8.5030001@broadcom.com> <20121005124353.GA22997@host2.jankratochvil.net> <50719168.7070107@broadcom.com> <20121007143438.GA31189@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121007143438.GA31189@host2.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00121.txt.bz2 > I have invested already many days into the patch above so will takeover it > myself. Unfortunately I have more serious work to do now or even up to > January. In that case, let's have someone take the time to look at this patch as a temporary measure. It would be discouraging to have your patch blocked for 2 months just because another more complete patch has been put on hold. -- Joel