From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5689 invoked by alias); 4 Oct 2012 07:20:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 5656 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Oct 2012 07:20:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 07:20:11 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q947K7WC013052 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 03:20:10 -0400 Received: from spoyarek (spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com [10.65.192.188]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q947K1pX022977; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 03:20:05 -0400 Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 07:20:00 -0000 From: Siddhesh Poyarekar To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] bitpos expansion summary reloaded Message-ID: <20121004124920.334b16d2@spoyarek> In-Reply-To: <20121003183842.GA16194@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120927190053.1e7de264@spoyarek> <20120929173938.GA2987@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120929181141.GA4009@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120930065211.GA21118@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20121003184155.03dceed4@spoyarek> <20121003183842.GA16194@host2.jankratochvil.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00057.txt.bz2 On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 20:38:42 +0200, Jan wrote: > It would work as long as both the compilation and > splint-bitpos3.locdiff.processed are whole from the exact one FSF GDB > GIT commit, as your scripting is doing the filtering just based on > filename:lineno. > > You may know the best but so far even you said that you were rebasing > codebase multiple times to various commits and I even failed to find > some of the reported lines. > > As long as the common commit is right I am fine with your solution. Yeah I had stuck to the same commit. Siddhesh