From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4014 invoked by alias); 21 Sep 2012 16:28:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 4002 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Sep 2012 16:28:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 16:28:10 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8LGS9HW031814 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:28:09 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-113-58.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.58]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8LGS6ZN021808 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:28:08 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 16:28:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Doug Evans Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] New option -nh: disable loading ~/.gdbinit Message-ID: <20120921162805.GA1028@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120921153508.GA29943@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00440.txt.bz2 On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 18:23:01 +0200, Doug Evans wrote: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > Wouldn't be the last option more clear than another magic option '-nh'? > > magic? Say what? I find already unclear which auto-loaded files are / are not loaded by -nx. It takes me always some time thinking about all the files which are / are not loaded with -nx. > > The patch would be short, I could even post it but so far it was more just > > some sort of a clean-up but if you even have a use for it. > > In this case I like the short -nh. OK. Regards, Jan