From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29475 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2012 16:49:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 29458 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Sep 2012 16:49:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:49:21 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q87GnJFY027185 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 7 Sep 2012 12:49:19 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-22.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.22]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q87GnFb0011845 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 7 Sep 2012 12:49:18 -0400 Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:49:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Khoo Yit Phang Cc: GDB Patches Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add -nx for "xgdb" test in gdb/testsuite/gdb.gdb/selftest.exp Message-ID: <20120907164915.GB18234@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <387EE3E3-80B3-42E0-AFE7-1BAA78B422D3@cs.umd.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00070.txt.bz2 Hi Yit, On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 04:40:27 +0200, Khoo Yit Phang wrote: > I found a few more tests with the same issue, here's an updated patch that > covers those tests. I am fine with checking in the patch if one can replace that '-nw -nx' by $INTERNAL_GDBFLAGS instead. If it does not work please reply here. Thanks, Jan