Re: bitpos expansion patches summary

Jan Kratochvil
2012-08-13T14:12:58Z

On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 16:03:13 +0200, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> No worries, I'll work on the watchpoint change once we get the rest of
> the stuff in if it is OK. Not having it in this change itself is not
> going to break something that is not already broken.

I am reluctant to check in the LENGTH expansion before getting all the needed
pre-requisite bits fixed. One cannot properly regression-splint-check it
afterwards anymore as HEAD is a moving target so it may start to be seriously
difficult to be tracking the changes happening between LENGTH expansion and
before all the other bits get it. The splint results will have changing line
numbers etc.

Maybe it is possible to handle it somehow but I would find easier to check the
LENGTH expansion only as the last piece.

Thanks,
Jan