From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-94107-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 17516 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2012 16:13:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 17504 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Aug 2012 16:13:15 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:13:02 +0000
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7OGD1RT006995	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:13:01 -0400
Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-37.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.37])	by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7OGCv2R021910	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);	Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:13:00 -0400
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:13:00 -0000
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Jeff Kenton <jkenton@tilera.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: GDB test suite question
Message-ID: <20120824161245.GD7200@host2.jankratochvil.net>
References: <5037A142.3020505@tilera.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5037A142.3020505@tilera.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00736.txt.bz2

On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:44:02 +0200, Jeff Kenton wrote:
> 
> What is a reasonable target number for "unexpected failures" when
> running the test suite for a specific processor?

Diff the *.sum files, I do not think the count says anything meaningful.

Fedora 18 x86_64 says:
# of expected passes            24875
# of unexpected failures        16
# of unexpected successes       4
# of expected failures          52
# of known failures             68
# of untested testcases         8
# of unsupported tests          25


Regards,
Jan