From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24343 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2012 14:08:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 24329 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Aug 2012 14:08:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:08:30 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7OE8Ttq019268 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:08:30 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-37.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.37]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q7OE8PNj016416 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:08:28 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:08:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: consolidate checks for _Unwind_DebugHook in test suite Message-ID: <20120824140813.GA6808@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <877gt1zbr5.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120824133931.GC5219@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87ehmwmm4j.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ehmwmm4j.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00723.txt.bz2 On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:54:04 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: > > Jan> If gdb_test_multiple FAILs it will leave "ok" as 1 which will run the whole > Jan> testfile. Was it intentional? Maybe it was although I would expect the > Jan> opposite. > > Bug inherited from the status quo ante. I see now. > What do you think of this? It looks OK to me. Thanks, Jan