From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-93901-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 12589 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2012 18:33:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 12580 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Aug 2012 18:33:09 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 18:32:53 +0000
Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1])	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q7JIWiBm028565;	Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:32:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)	by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q7JIWZmi012610;	Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:32:36 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 18:33:00 -0000
Message-Id: <201208191832.q7JIWZmi012610@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: brobecker@adacore.com
CC: eliz@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20120819180647.GO2798@adacore.com> (message from Joel Brobecker	on Sun, 19 Aug 2012 11:06:47 -0700)
Subject: Re: New warning in GDB 7.5
References: <838vdcdl2q.fsf@gnu.org> <20120818205543.GL2798@adacore.com> <837gsvewyh.fsf@gnu.org> <201208182149.q7ILnLb3017336@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <83393jegz3.fsf@gnu.org> <20120819043652.GN2798@adacore.com> <83vcgeddsm.fsf@gnu.org> <20120819180647.GO2798@adacore.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00530.txt.bz2

> Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 11:06:47 -0700
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> 
> > And will this transparent conversion kick in
> > when .gdbinit does the following?
> 
> Maybe it does not ATM, but I don't see why it shouldn't. If it
> does not, I agree with Mark that this is suspicious.

Unfortunately the partial symbol table only contains information about
symbols.  In particular it doesn't contain type info.  So the
transparent conversion doesn't kick in if your .gdbinit only
references types.