From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21651 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2012 04:37:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 21544 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Aug 2012 04:37:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 04:36:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7AC01C7564; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 00:36:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id nfImCYl4onoV; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 00:36:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2291C7560; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 00:36:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 501DD14561A; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 21:36:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 04:37:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: New warning in GDB 7.5 Message-ID: <20120819043652.GN2798@adacore.com> References: <838vdcdl2q.fsf@gnu.org> <20120818205543.GL2798@adacore.com> <837gsvewyh.fsf@gnu.org> <201208182149.q7ILnLb3017336@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <83393jegz3.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83393jegz3.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00525.txt.bz2 > I always thought lazy loading of symbols was a feature, not a bug. Shouldn't the commands work regardless of whether symbols have been fully loaded or not, though? Lazy psymtab-to-symtab conversion should be transparent to the user. -- Joel