From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1759 invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2012 15:47:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 1749 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Aug 2012 15:47:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:47:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CAEB1C774E; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:47:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id mGafDyrsbkA9; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:47:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2541C7796; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:46:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 79AAE14561A; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 08:46:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 15:47:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] DWARF frame unwinder executes one too many rows Message-ID: <20120816154654.GC2836@adacore.com> References: <1343343082-15401-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <87r4rt2lhk.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r4rt2lhk.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00454.txt.bz2 > Joel> gdb/ChangeLog: > Joel> * dwarf2-frame.c (dwarf2_frame_cache): Use > Joel> get_frame_address_in_block instead of get_frame_pc as > Joel> the bound for executing the frame's FDE. > Joel> gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: > Joel> * gdb.ada/rdv_wait: New testcase. > > This looks good to me. Thanks, Tom. The patch is now in... -- Joel