From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28671 invoked by alias); 13 Aug 2012 18:17:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 28660 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Aug 2012 18:17:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:17:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C681C6879; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:17:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id wWM0MkNTmX20; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:17:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E32CB1C6878; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:17:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4D34014561A; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 14:17:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 18:17:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: fix PR 14386 Message-ID: <20120813181700.GA2742@adacore.com> References: <873946woli.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87txwfj0gk.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87txwfj0gk.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00372.txt.bz2 > Tom> I'd like to commit this to the trunk and the 7.5 branch; the latter > Tom> because it is a reasonably obvious, low-risk, and useful bug fix. > > After Jan's note today, I decided against putting this into 7.5. > It is not a regression. If it is deemed extra safe, and useful, I don't see a problem. But I am fine either way. -- Joel