From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28889 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2012 18:08:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 28877 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Aug 2012 18:08:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_PGP_SIGNED,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (HELO smtp.gentoo.org) (140.211.166.183) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 18:08:03 +0000 Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6207E1B400C; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 18:08:02 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb: improve usage strings Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 18:08:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.5.0; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1344704080-24677-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <201208111336.41052.vapier@gentoo.org> <83ehndco4n.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83ehndco4n.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5869939.lifAA7sAUr"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201208111408.02531.vapier@gentoo.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00345.txt.bz2 --nextPart5869939.lifAA7sAUr Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 657 On Saturday 11 August 2012 13:52:24 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > From: Mike Frysinger > > so it seems like finish *does* secretly accept options, but in this case > > it's trying to be secret about it rather than someone just didn't fully > > document it. or i read the "arg" parsing logic above incorrectly. >=20 > Isn't that the case of "finish &" ? i'm not familiar with async behavior in gdb. is it something that applies = to=20 all commands, or just to a select few ? if the latter, should we still=20 document it in the usage string ? Usage: finish [&] if the former, seems weird that every command would parse it itself ... -mike --nextPart5869939.lifAA7sAUr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-length: 836 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJQJp+CAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBdeUP/R2lvO+RT3oAXJLeJ6E7NJg9 oyd6I+eQ31e2Y75mB7vCbaBfeQi1L/DeDIzaEwr4uwsZHGrnd4NlEUcP5zI/V8Hs wGAH7eOo5UBYdDmcZHwgYtlgofJ2IxxswLIKyaGoKWaI7V6UAiKQ+hNtLT1UJZuI i1U0NHA/YGtYeF5gomh9FPopDDmv9WXBD+womOUoK6E4JYKEt3MLCGsfUzoBEUj9 dF2bd4EQXG8JShrCvwQwbhnjFDL5uBsYFOEhp0m2xQ01jA3ElTcyNbohXymsL4GD /SyiEuxaM8LSFllOUqw/aEDtMDTJcmrNj9Yi6s4qqxRj5gqtwM3AMYH8z84yxXgZ ZzKFApUG3X8QTE3X0P1obdhmtQ5l/geNOPjOQ4aChP6T9jV94MQWVzSknMLsTNOu Dr1hFCQy61uq5QgVwEv3eDZj3zPUPVqigvjS6fBhzkzGdsk+2WVtUkWNh/1c7brb YHthIxGk0EhGJN/RdlL+i1v7r2rboQJZy/9af+sApsCp9erNlGdrF9nC6pTra8Wm z4+n/3t5c88A5u6V/pk2mBjozLL/oZqtPOvt50puM1/J8K8IyqTpUNe2QqefHYNa 3qwvjKEd7OObkYDxAiaModPxJpm39mqE5a1Lan6NTI13yBj/HNW1vnuGifc4W7qs MUz5kQp1Xw9nJfixt2hC =sIFX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5869939.lifAA7sAUr--