From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20730 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2012 16:53:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 20717 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Aug 2012 16:53:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 16:52:44 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q77GqhBX014177 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 7 Aug 2012 12:52:43 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-49.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.49]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q77GqdxE008466 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 7 Aug 2012 12:52:42 -0400 Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 16:53:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: [commit+7.5] [doc] gdbint: Fix .gdbinit vs. new gdb-gdb.gdb Message-ID: <20120807165239.GA21695@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120807145436.GA30777@host2.jankratochvil.net> <83zk66fymy.fsf@gnu.org> <83y5lqfyed.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83y5lqfyed.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00239.txt.bz2 On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 18:40:58 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > I have noticed after all the auto-load changes this paragraph of gdbinit is > > > inaccurate now. > > > > Thanks, this is OK. > > I meant, your changes are OK. Sorry for being ambiguous. I understood it the right way. Checked in: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2012-08/msg00063.html and for 7.5 as it is apparently safe: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2012-08/msg00064.html Thanks, Jan