From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12418 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2012 15:00:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 12352 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Aug 2012 15:00:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 14:59:54 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q77Expr9030120 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 7 Aug 2012 10:59:51 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-39.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.39]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q77Exm3u017565 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 7 Aug 2012 10:59:50 -0400 Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 15:00:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Luis Gustavo Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH, ppc] Fix hw *points for embedded ppc in a threaded environment. Message-ID: <20120807145947.GA569@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <501FD5D6.30005@mentor.com> <20120806170405.GA9225@host2.jankratochvil.net> <502014B3.1090109@mentor.com> <20120806202734.GB2079@host2.jankratochvil.net> <50212C53.3020109@mentor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50212C53.3020109@mentor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00229.txt.bz2 On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 16:55:15 +0200, Luis Gustavo wrote: > I'm ok with coming up with that testcase. Should we go ahead and > have this in and the test commited shortly afterwards? If you are really going to write that testcase I find it easier later during analyses to have fix + testcase in a single commit. The testcase should be simple, shouldn't be? 7.5 is not going to be released these days yet. Thanks, Jan