From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Luis Gustavo <luis_gustavo@mentor.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
benh@kernel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, ppc] Fix hw *points for embedded ppc in a threaded environment.
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 20:28:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120806202734.GB2079@host2.jankratochvil.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <502014B3.1090109@mentor.com>
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:02:11 +0200, Luis Gustavo wrote:
> The ones you listed are server processors, and they use the old
> kernel interface. Examples of BookE's are the 4xx family (405, 440,
> 460, 476 etc...)
OK, thanks for info. I do not think I have those available.
> An appropriate test would be to run many threads and create the
> maximum amount of hw watchpoints and see if that works fine, but
> GDB's debug resource accounting is still a little awkward
One can test the number of registers in singlethreaded testcase and then run
the real test with multithreaded program.
A testcase would be nice, for example now the changes in
archer-jankratochvil-watchpoint3 and pre-requisite of non-stop compatibility
of hw watchpoints mean a lot of hw watchpoints rewrite in ppc-linux-nat.c.
But if you are not going to write a testcase then I find it OK for both HEAD
and 7.5.
Thanks,
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-06 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-06 14:33 Luis Gustavo
2012-08-06 18:40 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-08-06 19:02 ` Luis Gustavo
2012-08-06 20:28 ` Jan Kratochvil [this message]
2012-08-07 14:55 ` Luis Gustavo
2012-08-07 15:00 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-08-07 15:02 ` Luis Gustavo
2012-12-27 19:50 ` Luis Machado
2013-01-22 12:12 ` Pedro Alves
2013-04-17 20:33 Luis Machado
2013-04-18 0:19 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2013-04-18 0:51 ` Luis Machado
2013-04-22 21:09 ` Luis Machado
2013-04-22 21:09 ` Pedro Alves
2013-04-23 0:05 ` Pedro Alves
2013-04-23 1:15 ` Pedro Alves
2013-04-23 20:25 ` Luis Machado
2013-04-23 23:18 ` Luis Machado
2013-04-24 3:19 ` Pedro Alves
2013-04-24 6:28 ` Luis Machado
2013-04-24 19:04 ` Pedro Alves
2013-04-25 14:13 ` Luis Machado
2013-05-07 7:44 ` Luis Machado
2013-04-24 4:36 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120806202734.GB2079@host2.jankratochvil.net \
--to=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=luis_gustavo@mentor.com \
--cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox