From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9249 invoked by alias); 6 Aug 2012 15:06:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 9241 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Aug 2012 15:06:54 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 15:06:28 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q76F65hE020734 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 6 Aug 2012 11:06:05 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-27.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.27]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q76F60cw010310 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 6 Aug 2012 11:06:03 -0400 Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 15:06:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] DWARF frame unwinder executes one too many rows Message-ID: <20120806150600.GA4772@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <1343343082-15401-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <20120804123005.GA30962@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87boioktez.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87boioktez.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00176.txt.bz2 On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 16:05:08 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote: > Jan> according to Tom's reply it is a regression by: > Jan> commit 8d35b3995d73e87826263f02da0fd05190d34638 > Jan> Author: Tom Tromey > Jan> Date: Thu Feb 17 16:20:37 2011 +0000 > > No, that isn't what I said, or meant. I spent some time trying to find a regression but as I had no FAIL/PASS indicator (the Ada case did not work for me) I did not find any. As the discussion was about dwarf2-frame.c and you said On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 19:43:19 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote: > I looked into the history a tiny bit. It appears I introduced this in > revision 1.120, this GIT commit corresponds to dwarf2-frame.c CVS revision 1.120. But this commit does not seem to contain the regression to me so you maybe meant revision 1.120 of a different file. Regards, Jan