From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22672 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2012 06:26:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 22602 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Aug 2012 06:26:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Aug 2012 06:25:48 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q746PmNZ014257 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 4 Aug 2012 02:25:48 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-17.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.17]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q746PgOm018706 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 4 Aug 2012 02:25:47 -0400 Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2012 06:26:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: one approach to fixing PR 14100 Message-ID: <20120804062541.GA24443@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <87r4rpqnng.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <877gtgneto.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120803210203.GA21083@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87k3xfl8oj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87k3xfl8oj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00134.txt.bz2 On Sat, 04 Aug 2012 03:58:36 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote: > It's more useful to see where it was originally thrown; or to see what > sniffer is failing. I looked at it interactively, it was dwarf2-frame.c. > Then we need a cleanup instead. Yes. Thanks, Jan