From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21965 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2012 13:35:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 21718 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Aug 2012 13:34:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com (HELO e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com) (195.75.94.106) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:34:45 +0000 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 14:34:43 +0100 Received: from d06nrmr1307.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.38.129) by e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.140) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 14:34:41 +0100 Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.228]) by d06nrmr1307.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id q71DYfS21077436 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 14:34:41 +0100 Received: from d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id q71DYeOq018713 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 07:34:40 -0600 Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.85.9]) by d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with SMTP id q71DYc2H018639; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 07:34:38 -0600 Message-Id: <201208011334.q71DYc2H018639@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 01 Aug 2012 15:34:38 +0200 Subject: Remaining 7.5 regressions (Re: [ARM, commit, RFA 7.5] Fix HW breakpoints on unaligned addresses) To: brobecker@adacore.com (Joel Brobecker) Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:35:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20120801055436.GI2767@adacore.com> from "Joel Brobecker" at Jul 31, 2012 10:54:36 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit x-cbid: 12080113-4966-0000-0000-0000031B2741 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 Joel Brobecker wrote: > > Joel, would this be OK for the 7.5 branch at this point? > > Sure, as long as a GM is confident about a given change, that is > good enough for me. OK, thanks. I've committed this patch now, as well as two others: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-08/msg00017.html http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-08/msg00018.html > > In general, what's the timeline for 7.5? I've noticed a couple of > > other test case regressions when testing the branch on ARM, s390, > > and Cell ... > > The branch was created on July 17th, and the target date for release > creation is 2 weeks after that, which would have been today. I thought > there was still one open issue, but the release page says we're clean > (except for your issue). In addition to the failures fixed by the above patches, I'm still seeing: - Failures in gdb.base/pc-fp.exp on various platforms, as described here: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-07/msg00823.html (just an output formatting issue) - Failures in gdb.mi/mi-var-rtti.exp on various platforms, see: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-07/msg00458.html (seems to be a bug in the test case) - Failures in gdb.threads/watchpoint-fork.exp on ARM and PowerPC. This looks like a pre-existing bug that hardware watchpoints are not handled correctly across forks, which is now exposed since a test case for this scenario was added. - Sporadic timeouts (races?) in gdb.threads/siginfo-threads.exp and gdb.threads/ia64-sigill.exp on ARM (unclear) - Some new C++ regressions on ARM / s390x (could be compiler issues?) - Failures in various core file tests on PowerPC (needs investigation) - Failures in watchpoint.exp on SPU (needs investigation) - Failures in gdb.server tests on SPU (needs investigation) - Failures in gdb.threads/siginfo-threads.exp on s390 (needs investigation) - Failures in gdb.dwarf2/dw2-icc-opaque.exp on SPU and s390 (likewise) - Testcase harness failures when running a multi-lib configuration: ERROR: tcl error sourcing ../../../gdb-7_5/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/inferior-died.exp. ERROR: can't set "seen": variable is array ERROR: tcl error sourcing /home/uweigand/fsf/gdb-head/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/linux-dp.exp. ERROR: can't array set "seen": variable isn't array (Invalid re-use of a variable name?) All these are regressions from 7.4 to 7.5 as far as I can see ... > The easiest for me would probably to create it on Friday, assuming > that we don't discover something new by then. I'll see what I can track down and fix until Friday. Sorry for starting my test series a bit late this time ... Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com