From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27013 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2012 20:18:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 26996 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jul 2012 20:18:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 20:18:24 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6PKIO2Z006102 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:18:24 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-33.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.33]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6PKIHVc019355 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:18:22 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 20:18:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: [commit] [patch] testsuite: Fix Tcl < 7.5 regression [Re: [PATCH] sigall.exp and friends: centralize signals list.] Message-ID: <20120725201811.GB32664@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120719143526.8328.28449.stgit@brno.lan> <20120725134740.GA6900@host2.jankratochvil.net> <500FF9EF.7040208@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <500FF9EF.7040208@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00583.txt.bz2 On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 15:51:43 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote: > I agree; it's more self descriptive that way. > > I would never imagine lreverse would be so "recent". Checked in: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2012-07/msg00208.html Thanks, Jan