From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23474 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2012 19:29:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 23463 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jul 2012 19:29:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 19:29:19 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6PJTGAU023412 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 25 Jul 2012 15:29:16 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-33.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.33]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6PJTDoV005483 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 25 Jul 2012 15:29:15 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 19:29:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: "Abid, Hafiz" Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [patch] MI telnet service Message-ID: <20120725192907.GB24148@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120725130222.GA4538@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00577.txt.bz2 Hi Abid, On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:16:14 +0200, Abid, Hafiz wrote: > There has been some suggestions about making it a CLI command. FYI I do not understand this sentence. > But in that case, we will not be able to attach readline to the socket input > as readline is already connected with CLI. I think readline cannot handle > 2 parallel streams. I see that readline has its internal state... That CLI-on-top-of-MI proposal I sent along would solve it, each client would have its own readline. THanks, Jan