From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21898 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2012 14:55:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 21882 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jul 2012 14:55:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:54:35 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6PEsYxf023959 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 25 Jul 2012 10:54:34 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-33.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.33]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6PEsUeP018277 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 25 Jul 2012 10:54:32 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:55:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] change gdb to refcount bfd everywhere Message-ID: <20120725145424.GA16483@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <87sjcmv16h.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120723085355.GA29593@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120723090609.GA32703@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87mx2qqz79.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120724131720.GB24427@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87eho1ndi4.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83haswlxbv.fsf@gnu.org> <87sjcflxza.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120725142901.GA8653@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87d33jlwpm.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87d33jlwpm.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00535.txt.bz2 On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:52:21 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote: > I'll change it to 18. > It can't vary because there may be BFDs from multiple architectures in > the same listing. This is why you should do one scan before to find the maximum used width, like probe.c does. :-) Still I do not think it matters much for 'info maint', 18 should be enough. Thanks, Jan