From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32638 invoked by alias); 23 Jul 2012 18:09:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 32629 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jul 2012 18:09:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 18:09:32 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6NI9VE5028813 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:09:32 -0400 Received: from spoyarek (vpn-236-249.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.236.249]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6NI9TBq026301; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:09:30 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 18:09:00 -0000 From: Siddhesh Poyarekar To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove more instances of unsafe alloca Message-ID: <20120723233920.350b9b65@spoyarek> In-Reply-To: <87wr1ush9h.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> References: <20120723181116.00a4b508@spoyarek> <87wr1ush9h.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00462.txt.bz2 On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 08:07:22 -0600, Tom wrote: > >>>>> "Siddhesh" == Siddhesh Poyarekar writes: > > Siddhesh> 2012-07-23 Siddhesh Poyarekar > Siddhesh> * p-valprint.c (pascal_object_print_value): Replace > Siddhesh> potentially unsafe alloca with xmalloc/xfree. > Siddhesh> * valops.c (search_struct_method): Likewise. > > Ok. Thanks. > Committed: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2012-07/msg00182.html Regards, Siddhesh