From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31399 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2012 05:39:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 31296 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jul 2012 05:39:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,MAY_BE_FORGED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Jul 2012 05:39:21 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q665dKi5032572 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 01:39:21 -0400 Received: from spoyarek (dhcp223-8.pnq.redhat.com [10.65.223.8] (may be forged)) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q665dIIn020271; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 01:39:19 -0400 Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 05:39:00 -0000 From: Siddhesh Poyarekar To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Replace unsafe alloca for baseclass type Message-ID: <20120706110923.330dd5e7@spoyarek> In-Reply-To: <20120705135718.GA27886@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120704160423.1e7107a7@spoyarek> <20120705135718.GA27886@host2.jankratochvil.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00081.txt.bz2 On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 15:57:18 +0200, Jan wrote: > On Wed, 04 Jul 2012 12:34:23 +0200, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > > * cp-valprint.c (cp_print_value): Replace potentially unsafe > > alloca with xmalloc/xfree. > > OK for check-in, after you get the CVS write access and check in your > name to the 'Write After Approval' section of gdb/MAINTAINERS. > Thanks, checked in: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2012-07/msg00044.html Regards, Siddhesh