From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2219 invoked by alias); 5 Jul 2012 14:00:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 2208 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jul 2012 14:00:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 14:00:43 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q65E0gsM027847 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 5 Jul 2012 10:00:42 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-32.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.32]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q65E0c6E024338 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 5 Jul 2012 10:00:41 -0400 Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 14:00:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Nathaniel Flath Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] cd command defaults to ~ Message-ID: <20120705140038.GB27886@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00071.txt.bz2 On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 04:31:07 +0200, Nathaniel Flath wrote: > 'cd' in bash defaults to ~, whereas in gdb will throw an error. This > patch has the 'cd' command in gdb use '~' as a default instead of > giving this error. FYI I do not find it too much required, 'cd ~' is not such a burden, one may expect that 'cd' without parameters will do 'pwd' (which it does not) etc. Therefore I do not approve it on my own unless someone else does. It would need an update in doc/doc/gdb.texinfo and probably even gdb/NEWS. Regards, Jan