From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22812 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2012 17:32:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 22802 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jun 2012 17:32:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:31:52 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5SHVqnK002677 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:31:52 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-32.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.32]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5SHVdAr012041 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:31:48 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 17:32:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not respawn signals, take 2. Message-ID: <20120628173135.GA23347@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120622145525.27114.25720.stgit@brno.lan> <20120622191823.GA10515@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4FEC9405.7030503@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FEC9405.7030503@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00857.txt.bz2 On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:27:33 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote: > I found a couple ARM machines. This revision of the patch showed no regressions on > {x86_64,ARM} {native,gdbserver} GNU/Linux, and the new tests fully pass. I've > also done the promised re-indent in infrun.c. Thanks, I was stepping around the ARM issue with this patch for the last year. Jan