From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1267 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2012 15:05:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 1245 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jun 2012 15:04:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 15:04:34 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5JF4YhA007322 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 11:04:34 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-33.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.33]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5JF4TRw030489 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 19 Jun 2012 11:04:33 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 15:05:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Regression for -gstabs+ [Re: FYI: fix spelling of "delete" in c-exp.y] Message-ID: <20120619150428.GA5427@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <87k3z4pdzg.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120619104843.GA22015@host2.jankratochvil.net> <877gv3pf4g.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <877gv3pf4g.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00613.txt.bz2 On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:09:51 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote: > Why are we spending any time at all on stabs and C++? IIRC that never > really worked that well, and stabs are past obsolete. If we understand why is it as it is (currently I do not) I have no problem with anything about stabs. -gstabs+ already had/has many other C++ failures. I will also look at it more. Thanks, Jan