From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1813 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2012 16:35:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 1580 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jun 2012 16:35:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-qc0-f201.google.com (HELO mail-qc0-f201.google.com) (209.85.216.201) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:35:28 +0000 Received: by qcha6 with SMTP id a6so459624qch.0 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:35:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:x-gm-message-state; bh=lXcELtGsDRKleemw6mqiDl6cPz7Dw70lqI5Kvzx2lqw=; b=H3WOhEbt1SVKl8QynenG0EDjH16oAu4DQGf62UDriYPWB7SmQyoXXl/jvD2JUoJhsE mHF9/FyBzs/gcwyD5pypzr9j6d9JFbleuA2yO18aeuT7EftNz5QTuI33urxVr3M96fe3 Hoi1MNpfPSBheuWl0ndCE2v6+kp/Pv/WZggqNIv/mPD3hhX53f9vY2uIrkKPrMTr+4jJ 4Bkz30i7lLXbtgz4jwgD3o0/md54KQJsCM4G+atWBlcCYlVoNQfq4I3+DlXgu4KubgN8 oPpIZdItg97fz0Z0w4cGdTe4cSQg1VE1w+NBJV68IdffD4wO4MmXQwDmOJHSoNYdi2Hq r+ZQ== Received: by 10.236.116.5 with SMTP id f5mr28704999yhh.4.1340037327262; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:35:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.116.5 with SMTP id f5mr28704994yhh.4.1340037327210; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:35:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wpzn3.hot.corp.google.com (216-239-44-65.google.com [216.239.44.65]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q35si12812798yhe.6.2012.06.18.09.35.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA); Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:35:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com (ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com [172.18.110.129]) by wpzn3.hot.corp.google.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA9D10004D for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:35:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com (Postfix, from userid 67641) id C1F211E136F; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:35:26 -0700 (PDT) To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Add more parallelization to gdb.base testing Message-Id: <20120618163526.C1F211E136F@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:35:00 -0000 From: dje@google.com (Doug Evans) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn/tdfvV6kd8Zp/JgNAIt8Z3oriTJqxuNpaWjnKbwmt4aqvBqY5HCKR+dgnZqDIynv+iqMib0p39dEN62VkGdpT/JZw5lhE49ViDdKIF+jb2rKFRKbfsG2qH6YNqQsnO9EvnRXpil8XZtmHVhGNjxWh6jjJvbs1t6uEq5L/Cy9saTe4qao= X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00589.txt.bz2 I wrote: > This patch speeds up gdb testing at -j6 on my machine from 7mins to 4mins. > I didn't want to get too carried away here, this felt like a good compromise. > I split the range into four roughly equal partitions alphabet wise, > then noticed that [a-g] has far more files than the others so made the split > more refined. I'm happy to use whatever partitioning folks want, I just > want the 4mins (or better). > > Ok to check in? > > btw, it's possible to do better. > The ideal is (effectively) to be able to run all the .exp's at once. > But that's a more work and this is trivial with a reasonable win. Blech. Bad cut-n-paste. Here is the correct ChangeLog entry. 2012-06-15 Doug Evans * Makefile.in (TEST_DIRS): Add gdb.base3, gdb.base4. (BASE1_FILES, BASE2_FILES): Change to handle a-d and e-k respectively. (BASE3_FILES, BASE4_FILES): New, handles l-r and s-z respectively.