From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22553 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2012 08:09:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 22535 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jun 2012 08:09:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 08:09:11 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5I89BUs018862 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 04:09:11 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-33.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.33]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5I8977r026108 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 04:09:10 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 08:09:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Possible future NX ON_STACk regression Re: [patch 3/3] Use ON_STACK for i386/amd64 (gdb2495.exp regression) Message-ID: <20120618080907.GA24971@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120613155103.GC26214@host2.jankratochvil.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120613155103.GC26214@host2.jankratochvil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00568.txt.bz2 On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:51:03 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > + set_gdbarch_call_dummy_location (gdbarch, ON_STACK); In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832534 Nathan Sidwell reports that inferior calls segfault with inferior non-executable stack and Fedora GDB already containing this patch. I do not have it reproducible, I guess it may be CPU firmware dependent. Regards, Jan