From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19063 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2012 19:52:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 19055 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jun 2012 19:52:54 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:52:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8353F1C7372; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:52:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id y5X2USdQ-RUR; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:52:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD7C1C7364; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:52:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 90D02145616; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 12:52:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:52:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: Hans-Peter Nilsson , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: build error for mn10300-elf sim with your recent commit Message-ID: <20120615195238.GB18729@adacore.com> References: <201206151846.q5FIkL3Z026410@ignucius.se.axis.com> <20120615185559.GZ18729@adacore.com> <20120615191516.GA18729@adacore.com> <4FDB8F4C.8070404@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FDB8F4C.8070404@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00528.txt.bz2 > I'm confused. Nothing outside of bfd should be including bfd/sysdep.h. > Is that what is happening? Yep. And for the record, I did try to compile without including sysdep.h, and it built just fine. But I am assuming that there are some hosts that this is going to break, and since I can't test the change on every single hosts out there... -- Joel