From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24789 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2012 10:21:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 24775 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jun 2012 10:21:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:21:37 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5EALblh014735 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 14 Jun 2012 06:21:37 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-33.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.33]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5EALYQR032358 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Jun 2012 06:21:36 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:21:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] Support gcc-4.7 DW_OP_GNU_parameter_ref Message-ID: <20120614102133.GA5351@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120614064848.GA13247@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120614072301.GA23971@host2.jankratochvil.net> <201206140937.q5E9betP031608@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201206140937.q5E9betP031608@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00463.txt.bz2 On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:37:40 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:48:48 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > > + cu_offset offset; > > > > Unused variable. > > Am I going mad, or is Jan really reviewing his own diffs? I wanted to prevent this obvious comment during a possible review by someone else but sure the mail was redundent. Regards, Jan