From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15575 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2012 09:38:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 15369 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jun 2012 09:38:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (83.163.83.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:37:49 +0000 Received: from glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5E9bjXo015467; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:37:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id q5E9betP031608; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:37:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:38:00 -0000 Message-Id: <201206140937.q5E9betP031608@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20120614072301.GA23971@host2.jankratochvil.net> (message from Jan Kratochvil on Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:23:01 +0200) Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] Support gcc-4.7 DW_OP_GNU_parameter_ref References: <20120614064848.GA13247@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120614072301.GA23971@host2.jankratochvil.net> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00461.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:23:01 +0200 > From: Jan Kratochvil > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:48:48 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > --- a/gdb/dwarf2expr.c > > +++ b/gdb/dwarf2expr.c > > @@ -1392,6 +1392,21 @@ execute_stack_op (struct dwarf_expr_context *ctx, > > "or for DW_OP_breg*(0)+DW_OP_deref*")); > > } > > > > + case DW_OP_GNU_parameter_ref: > > + { > > + cu_offset offset; > > Unused variable. Am I going mad, or is Jan really reviewing his own diffs?