From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26586 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2012 21:52:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 26577 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jun 2012 21:52:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 21:52:02 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5CLpeSC003058 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 12 Jun 2012 17:51:40 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-33.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.33]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q5CLpJXs029238 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 12 Jun 2012 17:51:23 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 21:52:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] Fix Sun compiler compat. for empty structs (PR build/14003) Message-ID: <20120612215116.GA23941@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120612204751.GA13700@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120612212413.GS2687@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120612212413.GS2687@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00373.txt.bz2 On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 23:24:13 +0200, Joel Brobecker wrote: > A structure type describes a sequentially allocated nonempty > set of member objects [...] oops, OK. > Perhaps using #if 0 instead might make it looks like a little less unusual, > not sure... While #if 0 is IIRC forbidden in general it would at least permit ctags to work. Thanks, Jan