From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26980 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2012 20:27:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 26972 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jun 2012 20:26:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 20:26:41 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04051C67EE; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 16:26:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id rGp6IHywgm3z; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 16:26:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC52C1C67D5; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 16:26:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2434B145616; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 13:26:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 20:27:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Add xmlRegisters qSupported on ppc-lynx... Message-ID: <20120605202633.GG2659@adacore.com> References: <20120605170305.GA25948@adacore.com> <4FCE4A3A.1080706@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FCE4A3A.1080706@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00157.txt.bz2 > XML target descriptions are supported today even without GDB > broadcasting support with xmlRegister first, so even if xmlRegister > isn't sent in qSupported, the remote can't know whether GDB supports > XML descriptions or not. Ah, OK! This is really nice. I missed the query packet in the unmodified version when I first started looking at this issue. > You just need the configure.srv change, actually. Thanks for the detailed feedback. I will test that, and send a patch. -- Joel