On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 23:54:19 +0200, Jan wrote:
> 
> Unless someone else is going to protect all the hundreds/thousands of
> callers I do not think it is worth it and ssize_t is good enough.
> 

OK, thanks for the explanation. Updated patch attached.

Regards,
Siddhesh

gdb/ChangeLog:

2012-06-05  Siddhesh Poyarekar  <siddhesh@redhat.com>

	* corefile.c (read_memory): Accept LEN argument as ssize_t.
	(read_stack): Likewise.
	(write_memory): Likewise.
	* gdbcore.h (read_memory): Likewise.
	(read_stack): Likewise.
	(write_memory): Likewise.
	* remote.c (remote_write_bytes_aux): Likewise.
	(remote_write_bytes): Likewise.
	* target.c (target_read_stack): Likewise.
	(target_write_memory): Likewise.
	(target_write_raw_memory): Likewise.
	* target.h (target_read_stack): Likewise.
	(target_write_memory): Likewise.
	(target_write_raw_memory): Likewise.