From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4765 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 2012 19:08:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 4755 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jun 2012 19:08:17 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 19:08:01 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q51J80Pr022326 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 1 Jun 2012 15:08:01 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-47.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.47]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q51IOI3M012355 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 1 Jun 2012 14:24:21 -0400 Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 19:08:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Pedro Alves Cc: Joakim Tjernlund , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] solib-svr4: Avoid unwanted shlib internal BPs When debugging Linux kernel or u-boot Message-ID: <20120601182418.GA8464@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <1338562868-22411-1-git-send-email-Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se> <4FC8EC08.1060609@redhat.com> <20120601172214.GA21236@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4FC8FDD2.7060407@redhat.com> <20120601174527.GA968@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4FC907B1.2090805@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FC907B1.2090805@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 20:19:29 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote: > Right. So you're okay with the patch as is, right? Yes. Thanks, Jan