From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29476 invoked by alias); 29 May 2012 17:17:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 29467 invoked by uid 22791); 29 May 2012 17:17:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 May 2012 17:17:15 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4THH3Mq016855 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 29 May 2012 13:17:03 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-47.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.47]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4THGxuM023011 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 29 May 2012 13:17:02 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 17:17:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Three weeks to branching (gdb 7.5 release) Message-ID: <20120529171658.GA11359@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120511181737.GP29339@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120511181737.GP29339@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg01029.txt.bz2 On Fri, 11 May 2012 20:17:37 +0200, Joel Brobecker wrote: > http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/GDB_7.5_Release > > When you add an issue, [Jan] Fix gdb.cp/gdb2495.exp regression with gcc-4.7 http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-03/msg00357.html 1/2 http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-03/msg00358.html 2/2 - This is not a regression of GDB itself but it is a regression of the whole GNU toolchain. There is missing some protection against stale breakpoints on stack (ON_STACK) after longjmps/throws (I do not remember it much now). I use in Fedora these patches. [Jan] workaround stale frame_info * ( http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13866 ) http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-04/msg00058.html - some proper fix will almost sure not get into 7.5 so maybe to fix "finish" crashes the workaround could be even applied for FSF GDB HEAD? I use in Fedora this workaround. Regards, Jan