From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2912 invoked by alias); 18 May 2012 22:00:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 2879 invoked by uid 22791); 18 May 2012 22:00:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 May 2012 22:00:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BAD01C6D21; Fri, 18 May 2012 18:00:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id G8FNyG4QFSya; Fri, 18 May 2012 18:00:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3895F1C6CFD; Fri, 18 May 2012 18:00:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 633E0145616; Fri, 18 May 2012 15:00:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 22:00:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Sergio Durigan Junior Cc: Pierre Muller , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Add ARI directory to gdb sources Message-ID: <20120518220009.GO10253@adacore.com> References: <003901cd3337$66ac7b10$34057130$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <20120516144420.GW10253@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00718.txt.bz2 > Pierre showed up in IRC and mentioned that someone suggested > `gdb/contrib'. I could not find the thread/message, but I support this > idea FWIW. `gdb/contrib/ari' would be good, then. > > My rationale is that ARI is not part of GDB as a program nor distributed > with it, so creating `gdb/ari' would perhaps confuse people because > there are other directories there like `gdb/mi' or `gdb/cli'. That was Doug Evans. I have no issues with contrib/ari, and I kind of like it better too. I do feel the need to correct that the new scripts will be part of GDB, and thus will be distributed with it as well. -- Joel