From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31876 invoked by alias); 15 May 2012 13:37:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 31804 invoked by uid 22791); 15 May 2012 13:37:27 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 May 2012 13:37:14 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4FDan8Q020046 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 15 May 2012 09:36:49 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-17.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.17]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4FDaiom018270 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 15 May 2012 09:36:47 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 13:37:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Stan Shebs , Yao Qi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: [commit#2] testsuite: gdb.base/dprintf.exp PR 12649 race [Re: [PATCH v2] dynamic printf] Message-ID: <20120515133644.GA18167@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <4FA8BC97.2000801@earthlink.net> <4FA8D049.109@codesourcery.com> <4FB12A8E.7040905@earthlink.net> <20120515130954.GA16932@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120515133340.GQ10253@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120515133340.GQ10253@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00567.txt.bz2 On Tue, 15 May 2012 15:33:40 +0200, Joel Brobecker wrote: > I think you can also remove the breakpoint on "main", since > "runto" deletes all breakpoints and inserts a new one. yes: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2012-05/msg00108.html --- src/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2012/05/15 13:08:57 1.3190 +++ src/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2012/05/15 13:36:17 1.3191 @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ PR testsuite/12649 * gdb.base/dprintf.exp: Replace gdb_run_cmd by runto main. + * gdb.base/dprintf.exp: Remove now redundant breakpoint for main. + 2012-05-14 Sergio Durigan Junior * gdb.base/stap-probe.exp (stap_test): Remove calls to --- src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dprintf.exp 2012/05/15 13:08:58 1.2 +++ src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dprintf.exp 2012/05/15 13:36:18 1.3 @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ set bp_location1 [gdb_get_line_number "set breakpoint 1 here"] set dp_location1 [gdb_get_line_number "set dprintf 1 here"] -gdb_breakpoint "main" if ![runto main] { return -1 }