From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22426 invoked by alias); 15 May 2012 09:49:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 22414 invoked by uid 22791); 15 May 2012 09:49:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 May 2012 09:48:58 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4F9mwnQ006540 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 05:48:58 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-17.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.17]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q4F9msdH010905 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 15 May 2012 05:48:57 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 09:49:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Siddhesh Poyarekar Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey Subject: Re: ping: [PATCH v2] Expand bitpos and type.length to LONGEST and ULONGEST Message-ID: <20120515094854.GA7020@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <20120220132724.GB4753@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> <20120221210235.GA26897@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120504183858.67d416b7@spoyarek> <20120515151612.5b5fac87@spoyarek> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120515151612.5b5fac87@spoyarek> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00557.txt.bz2 On Tue, 15 May 2012 11:46:12 +0200, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > Ping? I am already working on it, it is very long. BTW it needs one chunk rebase to HEAD and there is also one small pulongest issue - build failure - on 32-bit hosts. But otherwise I do not have other results yet. I expect you were checking it by splint again, I have not run it yet for this patch. Thanks, Jan