From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: hjl.tools@gmail.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: Support x32 siginfo_t conversion
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 21:16:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201205122116.q4CLG6lN019181@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOoEX+eYQmKPz-ev4DBKPY40niysoMAUZ+404OFpOaDmTA@mail.gmail.com> (hjl.tools@gmail.com)
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4432 bytes --]
> Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 13:55:29 -0700
> From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> >> Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 12:21:33 -0700
> >> From: "H.J. Lu" <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This patch implements x32 siginfo_t conversion. Tested on Linux/x86-64.
> >> OK to install?
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >>
> >> H.J.
> >> --
> >> * amd64-linux-nat.c (compat_x32_clock_t): New.
> >> (compat_x32_siginfo_t): Likewise.
> >> (compat_x32_siginfo_from_siginfo): Likewise.
> >> (siginfo_from_compat_x32_siginfo): Likewise.
> >> (amd64_linux_siginfo_fixup): Call compat_x32_siginfo_from_siginfo
> >> and siginfo_from_compat_x32_siginfo for x32.
> >>
> >> diff --git a/gdb/amd64-linux-nat.c b/gdb/amd64-linux-nat.c
> >> index 3be8404..97c9a49 100644
> >> --- a/gdb/amd64-linux-nat.c
> >> +++ b/gdb/amd64-linux-nat.c
> >> @@ -591,6 +591,67 @@ typedef struct compat_siginfo
> >> } _sifields;
> >> } compat_siginfo_t;
> >>
> >> +/* For x32, clock_t in _sigchld is 64bit aligned at 4 bytes. */
> >> +typedef long __attribute__ ((__aligned__ (4))) compat_x32_clock_t;
> >
> > Sorry, but that isn't acceptable.
> >
> > Is your X32 ABI really that broken?
> >
> >> +typedef struct compat_x32_siginfo
> >> +{
> >> + int si_signo;
> >> + int si_errno;
> >> + int si_code;
> >> +
> >> + union
> >> + {
> >> + int _pad[((128 / sizeof (int)) - 3)];
> >> +
> >> + /* kill() */
> >> + struct
> >> + {
> >> + unsigned int _pid;
> >> + unsigned int _uid;
> >> + } _kill;
> >> +
> >> + /* POSIX.1b timers */
> >> + struct
> >> + {
> >> + compat_timer_t _tid;
> >> + int _overrun;
> >> + compat_sigval_t _sigval;
> >> + } _timer;
> >> +
> >> + /* POSIX.1b signals */
> >> + struct
> >> + {
> >> + unsigned int _pid;
> >> + unsigned int _uid;
> >> + compat_sigval_t _sigval;
> >> + } _rt;
> >> +
> >> + /* SIGCHLD */
> >> + struct
> >> + {
> >> + unsigned int _pid;
> >> + unsigned int _uid;
> >> + int _status;
> >> + compat_x32_clock_t _utime;
> >> + compat_x32_clock_t _stime;
> >> + } _sigchld;
> >> +
> >> + /* SIGILL, SIGFPE, SIGSEGV, SIGBUS */
> >> + struct
> >> + {
> >> + unsigned int _addr;
> >> + } _sigfault;
> >> +
> >> + /* SIGPOLL */
> >> + struct
> >> + {
> >> + int _band;
> >> + int _fd;
> >> + } _sigpoll;
> >> + } _sifields;
> >> +} compat_x32_siginfo_t __attribute__ ((__aligned__ (8)));
> >
> > Same here. I don't think you need alignment here, even with the broken ABI.
> >
> > If it really is too late to fix the X32 ABI, you'll have to write this
> > portably by splitting _utime and _stime into two 32-bit variables and
> > write code that correctly sets the upper and lower 32-bits.
> >
> >
>
> X32 ABI choice is done on purpose. X32 siginfo_t has
>
> typedef long __attribute__ ((__aligned__ (4))) compat_x32_clock_t;
>
> typedef struct compat_x32_siginfo
> {
> int si_signo;
> int si_errno;
> int si_code;
>
> union
> {
> ...
> /* SIGCHLD */
> struct
> {
> unsigned int _pid;
> unsigned int _uid;
> int _status;
> compat_x32_clock_t _utime;
> compat_x32_clock_t _stime;
> } _sigchld;
> ...
> } compat_x32_siginfo_t __attribute__ ((__aligned__ (8)));
>
> struct info is aligned at 8 bytes and type of _utime/_stime is aligned
> at 4 bytes. However, _utime offset is 3 * 4 + 3 * 4 == 24 bytes. So
> in reality, the addresses of _utime/_stime are 8 bytes aligned. There
> are no needs to split _utime and _stime into two 32-bit variables
> since their addresses are 64bits aligned.
But there is no way you can easily express that syntax with standard C
syntax[1]. That's why you had to resort to using GCC's __attribute__
syntax. For GDB you'll have to figure out a way to do this without
using __attribute__ ((__aligned__ (...))).
My recommendation would be to define a compat_x32 structure just for
SIGCHLD (without using a union) and use the normal 32-bit comap
structure for all the other conversions.
Cheers,
Mark
[1] Well there is in C11, but you can't rely on that being properly
implemented for at least another 5 years or so.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-12 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-11 19:21 H.J. Lu
2012-05-11 20:11 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-05-11 20:55 ` H.J. Lu
2012-05-12 21:16 ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2012-05-12 23:16 ` H.J. Lu
2012-05-13 2:25 ` H.J. Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201205122116.q4CLG6lN019181@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
--to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox