From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] Implement multi-component --with-auto-load-dir
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 20:51:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120509205119.GN15555@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120509203350.GA15551@host2.jankratochvil.net>
> With Fedora scl-utils ("alternative packaging") you have both regular
> /usr/share/gdb/auto-load/
> and also the "alternative"
> /opt/rh/upgradeset/root/usr/share/gdb/auto-load/
I see. I wish we could manage both with one setting. Since we need
a "list" of directories, I'd keep "auto-load script-dir" (should we make
that script-dir plural?)...
I can see how things can be awkward for turning the safety guard off
(the equivalent of what we used to do with "auto-load safe-path").
I think I'd just make that a boolean setting instead.
> > I was hoping at some point that this would allow us to have auto-loaded
> > scripts without having to have the same path structure in the auto-load
> > directory as in the executable (by that, I mean that if you are
> > debugging /work/build/gcc-feature-a/gcc/cc1, you don't need to have
> > cc1-gdb.gdb defined in your auto-load directory as
> > auto-load/work/build/gcc-feature-a/gcc/cc1-gdb.gdb. It'd just be
> > sufficient to have cc1-gdb.gdb defined in your scripts-directory.
> > But looking at the code, I don't think that this is what we are
> > talking about.
>
> I do not think these two features are related. I can think about some ideas
> but I do not see a super-elegant one for it now.
No, they are not related, and you shouldn't have to worry about that
(unless you want to!). It's a feature I think some users would enjoy
having, but if I want it, I should be the one taking care of the
implementation.
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-09 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-09 15:49 Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-09 17:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-05-09 18:04 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-09 18:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-05-09 18:44 ` [doc patch] path vs. directory separator [Re: [patch 2/2] Implement multi-component --with-auto-load-dir] Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-09 19:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-05-09 19:30 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-09 18:55 ` [patch 2/2] Implement multi-component --with-auto-load-dir Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-09 19:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-05-11 18:21 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-09 20:18 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-05-09 20:34 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-05-09 20:51 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2012-05-11 18:47 ` Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120509205119.GN15555@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox