From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6310 invoked by alias); 5 May 2012 15:36:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 6126 invoked by uid 22791); 5 May 2012 15:36:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 May 2012 15:35:39 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q45FZRQ3024538 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 5 May 2012 11:35:27 -0400 Received: from host2.jankratochvil.net (ovpn-116-17.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.17]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q45FZNMo023214 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 5 May 2012 11:35:25 -0400 Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 15:36:00 -0000 From: Jan Kratochvil To: Joel Brobecker Cc: John Steele Scott , Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] PR symtab/13277: Resolving opaque structures in ICC generated binaries. (testcase) Message-ID: <20120505153522.GA13466@host2.jankratochvil.net> References: <4E9A6F3C.6010400@toojays.net> <20111019084011.GA9326@host1.jankratochvil.net> <4EA3E995.8040206@toojays.net> <20111026221057.GA24628@host1.jankratochvil.net> <4EBFAC05.2070501@toojays.net> <4FA49314.5020508@toojays.net> <20120505151557.GU15555@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120505151557.GU15555@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00159.txt.bz2 On Sat, 05 May 2012 17:15:57 +0200, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Not sure about the use of .asciz or not. We seem to have been using > .ascii exclusively so far. Jan might know better whether that's ok. I do not know about such specific incompatibility. Jan